Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Photo by Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images

‘We don’t live in a democracy’: Elon Musk and JD Vance push conspiracy theory as Trump legal losses mount

Former President Donald Trump’s recent legal battles have resulted in significant setbacks, with a Stanford political science professor finding that Trump has lost 96% of his cases this month. Even with Republican-appointed judges, the loss rate stands at 72%.

Recommended Videos

According to MSNBC, the mounting legal defeats have sparked controversial responses from Trump’s allies, including Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, who suggested a conspiracy against Trump within the justice system. Trump himself has gone further, labeling judges who rule against him as “monsters” and “lunatics” who are working against American interests.

About a month after Trump’s second inaugural, Elon Musk appeared on Fox News arguing that “If the will of the president is not implemented and the president is representative of the people, that means the will of the people is not being implemented, and that means we don’t live in a democracy.”

Vice president raises concerns about courts overturning ‘will of the people’

Vice President JD Vance, in a recent interview with The New York Times’ Ross Douthat, expressed similar sentiments, describing a “real conflict” between judicial interpretation and democratic principles. Vance claimed that courts are making “an effort to quite literally overturn the will of the American people.”

This argument suggests that since Trump won a democratic election, challenging his actions through the courts somehow defies democracy itself. However, this interpretation contradicts the fundamental principles of the American political system, which is designed with checks and balances.

Legal experts point out that it is not the judiciary’s role to defer to another branch of government based on election results. The courts are tasked with evaluating legal disputes on their merits, regardless of electoral outcomes.

New York magazine’s Ed Kilgore has criticized this perspective, noting that the repeated suggestion that judges should bend the law to accommodate Trump because he represents the “Popular Will” is particularly concerning, especially given that Trump did not receive a majority of votes in the election. Kilgore argues that this narrative strengthens authoritarian tendencies among the president’s supporters and advisers.


Attack of the Fanboy is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Sadik Hossain
Sadik Hossain
Freelance Content Writer
Sadik Hossain is a professional writer with over 7 years of experience in numerous fields. He has been following political developments for a very long time. To convert his deep interest in politics into words, he has joined Attack of the Fanboy recently as a political news writer and wrote quite a lot of journal articles within a very short time. His keen enthusiasm in politics results in delivering everything from heated debate coverage to real-time election updates and many more.