Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Photo by Heather Diehl and Getty Images

Elizabeth Warren rips into Democrats who worry more about offending rich donors and demands they stop doing this one thing to regain voter trust

She gets it.

Senator Elizabeth Warren is demanding that Democrats immediately stop moderating their economic agenda just to make wealthy donors happy before the 2026 and 2028 election cycles. As reported by The Hill, the Massachusetts Senator delivered a sharp warning, telling her party that the path to victory isn’t about sanding down their edges to avoid offense; it’s about embracing “full-throated, economic populist ideas.”

Recommended Videos

If you’re wondering why she’s so fired up, it’s because she believes the party is listening to the wrong crowd in the wake of the 2024 losses. Warren stated during a speech at the National Press Club that powerful folks on Wall Street, in Silicon Valley, and throughout Washington are pushing a narrative that the Democratic platform failed because it was “too progressive.” They want the party to respond by “watering down our economic agenda and sucking up to the rich and powerful,” she said.

“They are wrong,” Warren emphatically stated. She believes that focusing on the concerns of big donors over the needs of working families is a failure strategy. Warren warned that “A Democratic Party that worries more about offending big donors than delivering for working people is a party that is doomed to fail, in 2026, 2028, and beyond.”

Warren wants the Democratic Party to focus squarely on the economic agenda to regain voters who lost trust in them

The senator believes Americans want to support candidates who genuinely understand their financial hardships and are willing to “take on a rigged system in order to fix it.” Revising the economic agenda just to “tiptoe around that conclusion” might appeal to the wealthy, but it absolutely won’t help Democrats build the bigger base they need to win.

Warren acknowledged the role fundraising plays in modern-day politics, noting, “I don’t believe in unilateral disarmament against the Republicans.” Democrats still need to raise cash, and that’s just a fact of political life. However, she draws a firm line, arguing that the money “just isn’t worth it” if it requires sacrificing core values and watering down the agenda.

So, what does victory look like? Warren pointed to successful candidates like New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani and New Jersey Governor-elect Mikie Sherrill, who won by focusing on cost of living with platforms that were easy for voters to understand.

Warren is demanding an aggressive economic vision that tackles the real issues facing families today. This platform should include boosting pay, building affordable homes, and “cracking down on corporate landlords.” It also needs to provide universal child care, increase Social Security checks, strengthen unions, and pass price gouging and right-to-repair laws. And, naturally, you can expect calls to increase the minimum wage, build universal health care, and tax the wealthy and giant corporations.

It all comes down to commitment, Warren stressed. She believes the party wins “when we run on the big changes it will take to build an economy for everyone.” This means calling out corruption and standing against the “avalanche of corporate money trying to bury our democracy.”

Warren wrapped up her speech by highlighting one specific area where Democrats must show commitment to the public: stopping insider trading. She emphasized that the party wins “when we stop members of Congress from buying and selling individual stocks and cryptocurrencies while they are writing laws that affect those very assets.”


Attack of the Fanboy is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author