Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

‘What could possibly go wrong?’: Ring’s Super Bowl ad backfires as left and right unite against ‘terrifying’ surveillance tech

Strong 1984 vibes!

Ring, the home security company owned by Amazon, unveiled a new AI-powered feature during the Super Bowl that immediately set off a wave of backlash. The commercial, which aired during Super Bowl LX, drew rare criticism from both sides of the political spectrum, with viewers raising serious concerns about privacy and mass surveillance.

Recommended Videos

The feature, called “Search Party,” allows pet owners to upload a photo of a missing dog or cat into the Ring app. Once activated, Ring says the image is shared across participating outdoor cameras in the surrounding neighborhood. Those cameras then use AI to scan for visual matches and alert the owner if a potential sighting is detected.

In the ad, a Ring spokesperson claimed the feature has already helped reunite families with their pets, saying Search Party has found “more than a dog a day” since its rollout. The commercial leaned heavily into emotional moments, showing relieved owners and happy reunions designed to highlight the technology’s positive impact. According to Mediate, many people weren’t convinced. 

Both political sides see the same privacy nightmare

The technology needed for this feature raises serious privacy concerns. People immediately understood this wasn’t just about finding lost pets. It creates a massive, always-on visual search system across entire neighborhoods.

The rare, united backlash from both sides of the political aisle underscores just how unsettling this technology feels to the public. While Ring’s Super Bowl ad leaned heavily on emotional stories about lost pets and happy reunions, many viewers quickly grasped the bigger picture.

The criticism came from both the left and right, which is unusual for digital privacy debates. Conservative commentator Stephen L. Miller called the commercial “propaganda for mass surveillance.” The Super Bowl broadcast also featured other controversial moments, including Trump’s reaction to Bad Bunny’s performance. Former New York City comptroller Brad Lander, a Democrat, warned “they can do this to anyone.” He added, “That’s terrifying.”

People across the political spectrum worried about Ring using this AI technology for purposes beyond finding missing pets. The idea of linking neighborhood cameras for automated searching disturbed many viewers.

GOP strategist Brady Smith called the Super Bowl ad “awfully dystopian.” He then asked, “What could possibly go wrong?” Meanwhile, the White House also made headlines during the game with an AI-generated Super Bowl video.

The united reaction from both sides shows how troubling this technology feels to the public. Despite Ring’s emotional appeal about lost pets, people understood this represents a major step toward widespread surveillance. The feature gives a corporation the ability to conduct automated, real-time tracking across entire communities.


Attack of the Fanboy is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
More Stories To Read
Author
Image of Towhid Rafid
Towhid Rafid
Towhid Rafid is a content writer with 2 years of experience in the field. When he's not writing, he enjoys playing video games, watching movies, and staying updated on political news.