Quantcast

Fallout New Vegas: Review

Welcome to Vegas. New Vegas.
It’s the kind of town where you dig your own grave prior to being shot in the head and left for dead…and that’s before things really get ugly. It’s a town of dreamers and desperado’s being torn apart by warring factions vying for complete control of this desert oasis. It’s a place where the right kind of person with the right kind of weaponry can really make a name for themselves, and make more than an enemy or two along the way.

As you battle your way across the heat-blasted Mojave Wasteland, the colossal Hoover Dam, and the neon drenched Vegas Strip, you’ll be introduced to a colorful cast of characters, power-hungry factions, special weapons, mutated creatures and much more. Choose sides in the upcoming war or declare “winner takes all” and crown yourself the King of New Vegas in this follow-up to the 2008 video game of the year,

Fallout New Vegas: Review

Welcome to Vegas. New Vegas.
It’s the kind of town where you dig your own grave prior to being shot in the head and left for dead…and that’s before things really get ugly. It’s a town of dreamers and desperado's being torn apart by warring factions vying for complete control of this desert oasis. It’s a place where the right kind of person with the right kind of weaponry can really make a name for themselves, and make more than an enemy or two along the way.

As you battle your way across the heat-blasted Mojave Wasteland, the colossal Hoover Dam, and the neon drenched Vegas Strip, you’ll be introduced to a colorful cast of characters, power-hungry factions, special weapons, mutated creatures and much more. Choose sides in the upcoming war or declare “winner takes all” and crown yourself the King of New Vegas in this follow-up to the 2008 video game of the year, Fallout 3.

Enjoy your stay. [Bethesda]

Fallout New Vegas: Review

Fallout New Vegas: Review

You know that old saying if it ain't broke don't fix it?  Obsidian, the developer in charge of Fallout New Vegas took this and ran with it.  Much if not all of what made Fallout 3 great remains intact in this latest tale from the wasteland.  The games craftsmanship is an art in itself as the new locale, The Mojave Wasteland, gives the gamer as much a sense of place as Fallout 3 did(if you can forget for a second all about Fallout 3).  The game's main story line is accompanied by obscure yet intriguing side quests and subplots.

The ease of management of your quests and inventory are back, your trusty pip boy returns to guide you on your way.  In fact, it's all pretty much the same as Fallout 3.  So what's not to love?  As someone who did enjoy Fallout 3 very much, it was nice to see some improvements made on the core elements of the game.  Crafting for one, a system where medicine or weapons can be created adds a little bit of depth to the gameplay.  The V.A.T.S. combat system also returns and continues to deliver the brutal satisfaction that it did in Fallout 3.

The general freedom that the game delivers in allowing players to roam the wasteland looking for sidequests, or just allowing you to march straight through the campaign is something to be expected.  There's no shortage of things to do, people to talk to, and ways to go about your time in Fallout New Vegas.  And there's something magical about the sun going down in the wasteland as you continue on your quest, whatever you choose that to be.

Fallout New Vegas: Review

The differences are so small between Fallout 3 and New Vegas aside from the setting of course, that it's hard to really appreciate any changes to the structure of the game because they are fairly minuscule.  One that stands out when you start your quest is the addition of the "Hardcore Mode" .  Which forces you to choose whether you would like to have the added realism of the harsh life of a wasteland adventurer.  In this mode Stimpacks heal over time and cannot mend broken limbs, Rad-Away removes radiation over time, ammunition has weight, and dehydration is a constant concern.  This added challenge makes the game a bit more fun, and a bit more frustrating in one neat little package.  A little added enticement to try your luck in New Vegas on hardcore is a "special reward" which you will unlock once completed.

Fallout New Vegas: Review

Fallout New Vegas: Review

I swear there were six or seven times when playing New Vegas when I looked around and couldn't tell you if I was playing Fallout 3.  The graphics in New Vegas don't seem to be much of an overhaul for a game that is now a couple years old, it would have been nice to see improvements made to better the franchise for the fans.  Don't get me wrong, New Vegas looks amazing at times.  New Vegas itself is actually pretty interesting, colorful, and distinguishes itself in a stark contrast to the rest of the game.  But, everything else looks pretty much the same.  It is almost as if the developers just used the assets from Fallout 3, made a few new areas to turn the capital wasteland into the Mojave wasteland, and called it a game.

In addition to the graphics feeling a bit dated, Fallout New Vegas' story just never hit home with me the way that Fallout 3's did.  Maybe it was the fact that Fallout 3 was my first title in the series to have ever played so I didn't really know what to expect and was pleasantly surprised.  This one not so much.

Fallout New Vegas: Review

Fallout New Vegas: Review

Alongside the dated graphics the overall controls and presentation of the game feel dated as well.  This game feels like Oblivion with guns, which was not a completely bad thing , but with such an awesome premise and huge following, you would think that a little more investment would be made in bringing a new and improved experience.   Sadly, this is not the case.  Your character still has that really floaty feeling, and camera angles can be changed from first person to third.  Though your character looks so gangly and awkward that you may not ever use the third person perspective.   Not to mention the fact that playing from the third person also makes it almost impossible to aim or pick up items.  It's not all bad though.  The game has some great scenic moments where the good balances out the bad.

After Fallout 3 I had grown accustomed to the glitches from the game. In New Vegas, I had to restart quite a few times due to the game locking up in certain situations.  Trying to climb mountains where maybe I shouldn't have, I have gotten glitched inbetween rocks where I couldnt get out of.  It doesn't happen often but it will most likely happen to others as early reports in forums are that others have been experiencing the same glitches.  A patch may be neccesary after release.

Fallout New Vegas: Review

Fallout New Vegas is a good game, but it plays second fiddle to Fallout 3.  As for long time fans of the series it may play second fiddle to even the previous entries before that.  It takes nearly everything about its previous title, while only making minor adjustments to the gameplay,  graphics and infrastructure of the game which ultimately makes Fallout New Vegas feel like an old shoe.  It's kinda of comfortable but deep down it stinks.    The shoe that is, I wouldn't say Fallout: New Vegas stinks it just not as easy to overlook the flaws of the game as it was in Fallout 3. Perhaps it was the less interesting story, or the graphics that feel a tad dated, or the loose and sloppy controls, but I certainly didn't have as much fun with this game as I had with it's predecessor. Though at least there was some fun to be had.

UPDATE:


Fallout New Vegas: Review

I replayed this title on the PC and enjoyed it much more than on the Xbox 360, which this review was based on.  So, for anyone trying to decide on which platform to purchase Fallout: New Vegas, the PC seems like the clear winner to me.  The graphics are crisper, it controls better, there were less noticeable bugs,  and the experience is geared more towards the PC gamer anyway.   I still don't recommend that you avoid it on console, I enjoyed the game much more the second time around, on the PC.

By on October 18, 2010
Did you this story? Please share it with your friends

122 COMMENTS
  • avatar
    Honest Indian
    REPLY

    Reviewer=Cunt.

    • avatar
      i kick critisizers asses

      yeah i also like alot of variation with my sex
      “yeah it was pretty good but it was too similar to last night, maybe you couldve switched it up with some new positions. or a gorilla suit. idk.”

  • avatar
    Kevin R.
    REPLY

    I disagree with you on the part about the story. I’ve been playing this for a while (Kudos K-Mart employees for putting it out three days early), and the writing is much better than 3′s. Heck, the basic premise is much better than Fallout 3′s. Let’s see, a war between three morally ambiguous factions that ropes you in because someone shot you in head vs trying to find your dad while the obvious bad guys from Fallout 2 fight the obvious good guys that were supposed to have died out after the second game? I’ll take the former.

  • avatar
    Max
    REPLY

    This is review is garbage.

  • avatar
    Cunt Smasher
    REPLY

    Agreed.

  • avatar
    Max
    REPLY

    Lapsus… This review is 100% garbage.

  • avatar
    Alex
    REPLY

    Wow the Fallout fans are already raging, but I agree with what the reviewer said, from the graphics being quite bad to the game not really being any different to Fallout 3.

  • avatar
    mechico
    REPLY

    So basically they should have made a complete new engine, a innovative never been told story and a completely bug free game within two years? Good luck with that!

    Since you never played Fallout one or two it’s clear how you don’t like the storytelling. It’s definatley an other approach than the one Bethesda did but fans of the original games will be pleased.

    You can’t be taken seriously since you overemphasize the value of graphics to a rpg. Sure it’s nice to have high end graphics but in the end it’s the gameplay that defines a rpg. Nothing in your review points out that New Vegas is a bad rpg in any way.

  • avatar
    jipsyfromafrica
    REPLY

    we see some attack from the fanboys here lol

  • avatar
    mechico
    REPLY

    Attack =/= discussion

  • avatar
    Kevin R.
    REPLY

    Also, Mr. Reviewer, there’s not much proof you actually played this. All the screenshots are from old previews of this game, and there’s only vague details about the game itself, and you complaining about the graphics even though graphics have a tiny and marginal effect on the gameplay.

    You also refered to Fallout 3 as “the first game”. Don’t do that.

  • avatar
    Bill Hess
    REPLY

    My favorite is reviewer=cunt that is great if I am reviewing that comment I give it a LOVED rating. I completely understand that there are going to be a bunch of people that disagree with me. Believe me I wanted to go gaga over this game. I have been patiently awaiting it as well, but i just didnt find it be any better or worse than Fallout 3. Which isnt really a bad thing its kind of like a gaming non-event.

    It’s not just the graphics, mechico. And I don’t think the graphics look bad, they just look dated.

  • avatar
    SUCKET“
    REPLY

    Shit i couldve written that too, just by looking at the trailers and the basic info the developers gave us. It looks like you just did that.
    It looks like you havent even played the game,
    there is NO mention of companions and how the new system works and you didnt even tell ANYTHING about the new weapon add-ons.
    Like some guys above said; you suck!
    And im not even a fanboy.

    Play the game first, and write later.
    A**hole.

  • avatar
    Balthezor
    REPLY

    I respect your opinions about the game, but this “review” just sounds like a bunch of personal opinions on some features of the game.

    I really don’t think you’ve played the game.

  • avatar
    mustard jelly
    REPLY

    @ Bill Hess

    How can you give fallout NV a “MEH’, if it is’nt any worse or better than Fallout 3?

    Even if it is an expansion (a big one if so) are the dated graphics and mostly same gameplay enough for such a poor review? You probably were expecting a complety different game with shiny new graphics.

    Would you give fallout 3 (if it would come out in 2010) the same review.
    I get the feeling you just want to be the first to put the review out, and to be honest its poorly written…

  • avatar
    ohlawd
    REPLY

    “this review was clearly written by a complete imbecile: He thinks that the Fallout 3 story was GOOD? He also constantly whines about the game looking dated, which is flashing lights for a bad game reviewer, I think this guy is just trying to be controversial. You can tell it’s a very rushed review too, he clearly just whizzed through the main quest and just wrote whatever he could for the sake of getting the first ever review out… Typical games journo”
    Quoted of someone.

  • avatar
    KingofMadCows
    REPLY

    I do agree that they reused too much of the visuals from FO3 and about the glitches/bugs. In all the interviews, the developers talked about how Vegas and the Mojave wasn’t nuked but that’s not what it looks like in the game. The left over bugs and glitches from FO3 are really annoying. I know that it’s partly a problem with the crappy engine but they should have at least tried to cut them down.

    However, I completely disagree with the other complaints. The gameplay changes are significant. The combat has been vastly improved with ironsights, different ammos, weapon mods, better melee and unarmed attacks, better damage formulas, etc. There are far more gameplay improvements from FO3 to NV than in other sequels like GTA: VC to GTA: SA, God of War 1 to 2 and 3, Halo 1 to 2 and 3, CoD: MW1 to WaW, to MW2, etc.

    You have many more options to solve quests. There are a lot more ways to solve quests peacefully. There are also more opportunities for trickery and backstabbing.

    The world is much more lively. There’s much more activity between the different towns. The things you do in one place can affect what happens in other places.

    The story is much better written and more original. FO3′s story was basically a rehash of FO2′s story.

    There’s also the fact that NV’s voice acting is way better and it was really complemented by how well written the characters were.

  • avatar
    screwkick
    REPLY

    So…more of Fallout 3 is a bad thing?

  • avatar
    LoboKhan
    REPLY

    ummm…. Fallout (1), Fallout 2 (2), Fallout Tactics (3), Fallout: Brotherhood of Steel (4), Fallout 3 (5), Fallout: New Vegas (6)…. and if you really want to get technical… Wasteland (0, circa 1988)

    lrn2game if you want to do reviews… for the records, Fallout 2 used the exact same graphics and gameplay as Fallout 1, they made a longer story, added weapon and armor content, and generally worked the bugs out of Fallout 1… imho, THAT is how you make a sequel.. fix what’s wrong, add cool shit, make a new story. Otherwise, all you get is a line of games that could have been good, except they keep having new problems in each subsequent game. Perfect the game engine and then make great stories!

  • avatar
    Bill Hess
    REPLY

    I shoulda just lied and say I loved it.

  • avatar
    SaintlyTurkey
    REPLY

    The reviewer thinks that FO3′s story was good.

    Obvious proof that he is an idiot.