Stefon Diggs filed a defamation suit to clear his name, but his accuser is now asking a judge to step in claiming the NFL star can’t ‘sue and hide’

The legal battle surrounding New England Patriots wide receiver Stefon Diggs has taken a sharp turn as a judge is now being asked to intervene in an escalating standoff over evidence. Christopher Blake Griffith, the individual at the center of the dispute, is pushing for judicial oversight, arguing that the NFL star isn’t fully cooperating with the discovery process in the defamation lawsuit Diggs initiated.

It’s a critical moment in the litigation, as the focus shifts from the original claims to the nuts and bolts of what each side can actually prove in court. Diggs filed this defamation lawsuit in late 2025 against Griffith following public accusations that Diggs had drugged him, sexually assaulted him, and conspired to have him harmed. The NFL receiver has consistently denied these claims, labeling them as fabrications meant to damage his reputation.

According to Marca, Griffith’s legal team is now claiming that Diggs is actively resisting the discovery phase, which is the mandatory period where both sides must exchange relevant evidence. In court filings, Griffith is asking the judge to compel Diggs to hand over specific financial records and documentation. The goal is to see if Diggs has the evidence to back up his claims that the allegations against him caused measurable reputational and economic harm.

Suing for defamation but hiding your bank records is a bold strategy

The argument from Griffith’s side is quite pointed. His attorney stated in the motion that Diggs “does not get to sue and hide,” implying that the player cannot pursue damages while simultaneously limiting access to the information needed to evaluate those very claims. Griffith’s team has also argued that Diggs is attempting to “obstruct any discovery that would test his claims,” noting that he “can’t have it both ways” by pursuing a defamation case while limiting transparency regarding his alleged damages.

To understand how we got here, it’s worth looking back at the origin of this dispute. The case initially centered on conflicting accounts of a May 2023 gathering at the Maryland home of Diggs. In his lawsuit, Diggs described the night as uneventful, noting that he returned home after a charity basketball event in Washington, D.C., and went to bed, with his assistant eventually asking Griffith to leave.

More than two years later, Griffith publicly alleged a far more serious version of events, claiming he had been drugged and assaulted. These accusations quickly spread across social media. Diggs responded by filing suit, alleging that Griffith knowingly made false statements “for online clout” and caused significant harm by tagging the NFL, the Patriots, and various brand partners in his posts.

Griffith’s legal team intends to challenge the narrative in court. His attorney stated, “Mr. Griffith is looking forward to showing the world in court, he is the victim.” For Diggs, the lawsuit is an effort to protect his reputation and professional standing. As a recognizable NFL wide receiver, any proven damage from these accusations could carry massive financial implications, especially regarding endorsements. However, the burden of proof in a defamation case is high.

Diggs has been navigating other legal challenges recently. In October 2025, it was revealed that his ex-girlfriend, Mulan Hernandez, filed a civil lawsuit alleging Diggs tried to prevent her from reporting physical abuse from June 2024. This filing came months after Diggs initiated his own lawsuit against Hernandez, accusing her of extortion. Furthermore, in December 2025, Diggs was accused of strangulation and assault following a pay dispute with his personal chef.

The chef claimed Diggs struck her and placed her in a headlock. She eventually filed charges after refusing to sign a non-disclosure agreement to receive overdue wages. Diggs’s lawyer stated that he “categorically denies these allegations.” On a personal note, Diggs’ life has seen major changes; he and Cardi B confirmed their relationship in June 2025 and welcomed a son that November, before ultimately splitting in February 2026.

As the judge weighs the current motion regarding the defamation case, the decision will likely dictate the next phase of the proceedings. If the motion is granted, Diggs will be required to disclose the financial and reputational evidence tied to his claims. If it is denied, Griffith’s ability to contest the lawsuit could be significantly limited.