Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Image by The White House, Public domain. Via Wikimedia Commons.

Supreme Court rejects Trump’s bid to appeal verdict that awarded E. Jean Carroll $5 million, and this is after he called the incident a hoax

The Supreme Court on Monday decided it would not hear an appeal by President Donald Trump regarding a New York federal court jury verdict that awarded writer E. Jean Carroll $5 million, CNBC reported. This decision marks the end of his attempt to overturn the outcome of the 2023 trial, where he was found liable for sexual abuse and defamation.

Recommended Videos

The high court, as is typical for such orders, did not provide any explanation for why it chose not to take up the case. None of the justices, three of whom were appointed by the president, issued a written dissent.

This legal battle traces back to a 2019 article in New York magazine where E. Jean Carroll first publicly alleged that the president had raped her in a dressing room at the Bergdorf Goodman department store during the mid-1990s. She subsequently filed a civil lawsuit alleging both sexual assault and defamation after he denied the claims. In May 2023, a jury determined that he had sexually abused and defamed her, though they specifically rejected her claim of rape as defined under New York Penal Code.

Trump’s legal team argued that the trial judge improperly allowed certain evidence to reach the jury. Specifically, his lawyers contended that the court should not have permitted testimony from two other women who claimed to be targets of sexual misconduct by the president. They also objected to the inclusion of the 2005 Access Hollywood tape, in which the president is heard speaking about kissing and grabbing women. Despite these arguments, a federal appeals court previously reviewed the case and concluded that a new trial was not warranted.

Following the Supreme Court’s announcement, Roberta Kaplan, a lawyer for E. Jean Carroll, released a statement regarding the finality of the situation. “Today’s Supreme Court decision affirms once and for all the jury’s unanimous verdict that President Donald J. Trump sexually assaulted and defamed E. Jean Carroll,” Kaplan said. She added, “His multiple efforts to appeal that verdict have all failed and today’s ruling ends his quest to avoid accountability for his actions.”

The president responded to the news through a post on his Truth Social platform on Monday. He characterized the civil suit as a fake case and reiterated his claim that he had never met the writer. In his post, he wrote, “I will continue the fight against this Weaponization and Lawfare Case against me, including the ridiculous claim of Defamation, with all of my power and strength.”

He further stated, “This Case is really against the United States of America, and all it stands for, and should never be allowed to happen to another President, or Candidate to be!” In a separate post, he claimed that New York state created a law for a brief period to target him, describing the situation as an injustice.

A spokesperson for the legal team representing the president also issued a statement following the court’s decision. The spokesperson said, “The American People stand with President Trump as they demand an immediate end to all of the Witch Hunts, including the Democrat-funded travesty of the Carroll Hoaxes. President Trump will keep winning against Liberal Lawfare, as he continues to focus on his mission to Make America Great Again.”

It is important to note that this is not the only legal issue involving E. Jean Carroll that the president is currently facing. A separate Manhattan federal court jury found him civilly liable for defaming her in a different instance, and he was awarded $83.3 million in that case. The president is currently appealing that decision at a lower federal appeals court. The defamation in that matter stemmed from posts he made on Truth Social in 2022 where he denied her claims and stated she was not his type.

For now, the Supreme Court’s refusal to hear the appeal regarding the $5 million verdict means the president will be required to pay the damages previously awarded by the jury. This result concludes the final path for an appeal on that specific case, setting a definitive end to that portion of the legal proceedings. The president has consistently maintained his innocence throughout the process, frequently labeling the allegations as hoaxes while focusing on his ongoing political goals.

As he continues to appeal the larger $83.3 million judgment, the legal landscape surrounding these civil claims remains active. The judicial process has now solidified the original jury’s findings, leaving the president to deal with the financial consequences of the 2023 verdict while he continues his broader legal challenges.


Attack of the Fanboy is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
More Stories To Read
Author
Image of Manodeep Mukherjee
Manodeep Mukherjee
Manodeep writes about US and global politics with five years of experience under the belt. While he's not keeping up with the latest happenings at the Capitol Hill, you can find him grinding rank in one of the Valve MOBAs.